integrationAPIemail

Integration Guide: Hooking Rewrite.top into Your Email Tech Stack to Prevent AI Slop

rrewrite

2026-02-04

9 min read

Technical guide to integrate rewrite.top with ESPs and marketing stacks for automated pre-send rewrites and QA to prevent AI slop.

Hook: Stop AI slop from wrecking your inbox performance

As volume and speed of AI-assisted copywriting skyrocket in 2026, email teams face a new, measurable threat: AI slop — low-quality, AI-sounding content that harms engagement and deliverability. You need automated, enforceable QA and rewrite steps inside your email stack so the content that reaches recipients is polished, compliant, and aligned with brand voice. This guide shows how to connect rewrite.top to common ESPs and marketing stacks so rewrites and checks happen before the send.

The problem now (short): why pre-send rewriting matters in 2026

By late 2025 and into 2026, major inbox platforms like Gmail shipped advanced AI features powered by Gemini 3 that summarize and surface messages. At the same time, industry discourse flagged 'slop' as a quality problem for mass-produced AI content. Those trends mean two things for marketers:

Inbox-level AI can reframe/summarize messages. If your copy sounds generic or AI-produced, summaries and snippets will damage trust and click-through rates.
Deliverability algorithms increasingly reward signals of intent, clarity, and natural language. AI slop reduces those signals and raises spam risk.

Pre-send rewriting and QA is the defensive layer that removes AI fingerprints, enforces brand voice, audits links and PII, and optionally optimizes subject lines and preheaders for inbox impact.

High-level integration patterns

There are three common ways teams add rewrite.top to an email send flow. Pick the one that fits your architecture, budget, and latency tolerance.

1. Synchronous pre-send API call (recommended for transactional and time-sensitive sends)

Flow: application or server generates email content → call rewrite.top rewrite API → receive rewritten content → send through ESP API or SMTP.

Best for transactional emails and triggered messages where latency is small and deterministic.
Requires implementing retry and timeout logic in your service.

2. Asynchronous webhook pipeline (recommended for batch campaigns)

Flow: draft created in CMS or marketing tool → push to rewrite.top queue via API or webhooks → rewrite.top posts back when ready → campaign enqueue step triggers send in ESP.

Enables batch rewriting and human review before send.
Supports approval gates, versioning, and audit logs.

3. ESP-native hooks and serverless functions (Lambda, Cloud Run) (recommended for deep ESP integrations)

Flow: use ESP inbound hooks or serverless functions (Lambda, Cloud Run) that intercept content at send-time, call rewrite.top, perform QA, then pass to the ESP send API.

Works well with providers that support pre-send or template processing (SendGrid transactional templates, Amazon SES receipt rules, Mandrill, etc.).
Lower operational overhead for teams already invested in the cloud provider.

Concrete integration examples

Below are practical blueprints and code samples for common ESPs and patterns. Replace placeholders with your credentials and environment variables.

Example A — Node.js synchronous pre-send (generic ESP API)

const fetch = require('node-fetch')

async function prepareAndSend(email) {
  // 1. Call rewrite.top
  const rewriteResp = await fetch('https://api.rewrite.top/v1/rewrite', {
    method: 'POST',
    headers: { 'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.REWRITE_TOP_KEY}`, 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
    body: JSON.stringify({
      subject: email.subject,
      body: email.html,
      profile: 'brand-voice-v2',
      checks: ['ai_style', 'plagiarism', 'spam_score']
    })
  })
  const rewriteJson = await rewriteResp.json()

  // 2. Optional QA gate
  if (rewriteJson.scores.ai_style > 0.7) throw new Error('AI style score too high')

  // 3. Send via ESP API
  const sendResp = await fetch(process.env.ESP_SEND_URL, {
    method: 'POST',
    headers: { 'Authorization': `Bearer ${process.env.ESP_KEY}`, 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
    body: JSON.stringify({
      to: email.to,
      subject: rewriteJson.subject,
      html: rewriteJson.body
    })
  })
  return sendResp.ok
}

This pattern gives you an atomic rewrite step with the send only happening if checks pass.

Example B — Amazon SES + Lambda pre-send hook

Use SES receipt rules to invoke Lambda on inbound drafting or utilize SES SMTP for transactional sends with a Lambda middleware that calls rewrite.top. The Lambda should:

Extract subject, preheader, and HTML
POST to rewrite.top API
Check results and sign metadata (rewrite id), then forward to SES send API

Example C — SendGrid Inbound Parse + Asynchronous Queue

For marketing sends created in a CMS and handed to SendGrid for delivery, implement an asynchronous queue that batches messages for rewrite.top. The queue handler posts back to your CMS or directly to SendGrid API once rewrite is approved.

Rewrite.top API best practices

Design your integration with these production-grade behaviors to avoid failures and edge-case deliverability headaches.

Idempotency and deduplication: include an idempotency key per draft so retries won't create duplicate sends.
Timeouts and fallbacks: set a 3–7 second timeout for synchronous calls. Have a safe fallback (e.g., minimal edits or a hold state) if API times out.
Signature verification: verify webhooks from rewrite.top with HMAC to avoid supply-chain injection.
Rate limiting: batch subjects and small templates to reduce API calls; use bulk endpoints where available.
Metadata and traceability: store rewrite ids and scores in your campaign logs for A/B and deliverability analysis.

Rule sets and checks to run before send

Rewrite.top can be configured with checklists and rule sets to enforce the policies you care about. Common checks:

AI-style detection: flag language patterns likely to be labeled as AI-generated.
Brand voice conformity: map copy to a brand voice vector and enforce thresholds.
Spam and deliverability heuristics: link density, suspicious TLDs, trigger words, excessive punctuation, and UTM hygiene.
PII and compliance filters: mask or remove Social Security numbers, credit card numbers, and other regulated data.
Accessibility checks: require alt text for images and semantic headings in HTML.
Link audit: validate redirects, broken links, and domain reputation before send.
Analytics tags: standardize UTM parameters to ensure consistent campaign attribution.

Preserving voice while removing AI fingerprints

The tightrope is keeping the author's voice and CTA intact while eliminating generic phrasing and hallucinations. Practical tips:

Use rewrite profiles that specify tone, complexity, and example phrases you want to keep.
Apply thinning—targeted rewrites for subject lines and first two paragraphs while leaving rest of copy untouched.
Keep a 'no-rewrite' whitelist for legal text, disclaimers, and required regulatory language.
Provide a human-in-the-loop approval step for high-value campaigns.

Deliverability considerations

Automated rewriting can improve deliverability if done right. Keep these in mind:

Consistent From and Authentication: ensure SPF, DKIM, and DMARC are intact after integration. Rewrites should never change the From or Reply-To without mapping rules.
Seed testing: use seed lists to test inbox placement for Gmail, Yahoo, Outlook before sending to full list.
Monitor metrics: open rate, click-through rate, spam complaints, bounce rate, and inbox placement. Track them per rewrite id to measure impact. Good logging and observability is essential for correlating outcomes with rewrites.
Gmail-specific: because Gmail now summarizes using Gemini 3, prioritize first 1–3 lines and subject clarity. Summaries often derive from those elements.

Operational reliability and security

Operationalizing rewrite.top means thinking beyond feature parity. Consider:

Logging and observability: log request/response bodies, scores, and decisions. Redact PII in logs.
Fail-closed vs. fail-open: choose a policy. Fail-closed halts send on rewrite failures (safer for high-risk content). Fail-open sends original content if rewrite service is unavailable (safer for transactional latency).
Data residency and privacy: ensure your plan matches GDPR/CCPA needs and that PII is redacted or tokenized before sending to rewrite.top if required—consider cloud isolation patterns and sovereign controls when necessary.
Secrets management: store API keys in vaults and rotate keys periodically.

Testing and measurement playbook

Integrations fail if teams don't measure outcomes. Use this playbook to validate benefits:

Run side-by-side A/B tests where version A is original content and version B is rewritten via rewrite.top.
Track short-term signals: open rate, subject line CTR, click rate over 48–72 hours.
Track downstream signals: conversion rate, unsubscribe rate, spam complaints over 14–30 days.
Analyze deliverability tools: Gmail Postmaster, Return Path, and seed inbox placement reports.
Map improvements to rewrite profile settings and tune thresholds iteratively.

Case example: how a SaaS publisher reduced AI slop complaints by 42%

Context: a mid-market SaaS publisher relied heavily on generative prompts for weekly newsletters. Recipients reported generic tone and engagement fell 8% year-over-year. Integration steps:

Added a synchronous rewrite step for subject and first 200 words using a brand-voice profile.
Established an approval webhook that sent borderline items to an editor Slack channel.
Tracked rewrite ids in analytics and correlated with opens and clicks.

Outcome after 10 weeks: open rates +6%, click rates +9%, and complaints reduced by 42%. The editorial team reclaimed time because routine tone edits were automated, leaving them to focus on high-value content.

Operational checklist before you go live

Decide fail-open vs fail-closed policy
Implement idempotency keys and webhook verification
Build dashboarding for rewrite metrics and deliverability
Whitelist legal copy and required sections from rewrites
Run a 2-week seed test across Gmail, Apple Mail, and Outlook

Advanced strategies and future-proofing

As inbox AI evolves in 2026, consider these forward-looking tactics:

Semantic intent tagging: tag copy with intent metadata so inbox AI shows helpful summaries rather than neutral ones.
Adaptive profiles: automatically tune voice profiles based on engagement signals per segment.
Content provenance: include verified metadata so recipients and inbox AI can trace content origin and authenticity.
Multi-stage rewriting: apply a light rewrite for subject/preheader, deeper rewrite for hero copy, and editorial-first rewrite for long-form content.

The point is simple: speed without structure creates AI slop. Better briefs, automated QA, and human review protect inbox performance.

Quick troubleshooting guide

Rewrite requests failing with 429: implement exponential backoff and use bulk endpoints.
Emails marked as changed in a way that breaks render: ensure your HTML sanitizer preserves required tags or switch to text-based rewrites for templated content.
Unexpected deliverability drops after enabling rewrite: roll back to fail-open, run seed tests, inspect spam-trap hits and link reputation.
High AI-style scores despite rewrites: adjust profile, add exemplar phrases, and increase allowed human-in-loop approvals.

Wrapping up: why integrate rewrite.top into the send path now

In 2026 the inbox is smarter, and the penalty for generic AI copy is real. Embedding rewrite.top into ESP workflows gives you an automated safety net: it removes AI fingerprints, enforces brand voice, audits links and compliance, and improves deliverability signals. The result is faster scaling of content without sacrificing quality or trust.

Next steps and call-to-action

Ready to add a pre-send rewrite layer to your marketing stack?

Sign up for a developer key at rewrite.top and review the API docs.
Pick an integration pattern (synchronous for transactional, asynchronous for campaigns).
Run a two-week A/B seed test comparing rewritten vs original copy and measure inbox placement and engagement.

Start a free trial of rewrite.top and request the ESP integration guide for SendGrid, Amazon SES, Klaviyo, and Mailchimp. Ship with confidence — prevent AI slop and protect your inbox performance.

rewrite

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.